This last weekend was my husband's birthday. I asked him what type of cake he would like, and he mentioned a German Chocolate cake. My immediate response was no way...pick again. His second choice was a coconut cake. That was a little better.
If you've been following my blog, you know that I'm a "from scratch" baker when it comes to fancy desserts. It's really one of the only ways to bake when you are trying to avoid processed foods and have to cook for a peanut allergy.
After doing some recipe research online, and remembering that I had successfully pulled off the chocolate marble cheesecake he requested last year, I re-considered the German Chocolate cake. Especially since I found this great recipe that started with a boxed German Chocolate cake mix. Yes, I was willing to "cheat" just a little, especially this time of year when I'm on over-load. Well, the problem was, that I couldn't find a German Chocolate cake mix that I was willing to purchase given the list of ingredients. I did find a Dr. Oetker** organic vanilla cake mix, and after comparing the ingredients thought I'd take a chance. I also purchased Baker's German Sweet Chocolate bar (unfortunately, no other organic or peanut risk free option in site) to turn my vanilla cake to chocolate.
I mixed the box mix with the buttermilk, oil & eggs per the recipe I found on Barbara Bakes and then had to figure out how to add the chocolate. The recipe that came with the chocolate instructed to melt the chocolate in the microwave with 1/2 cup of water. No sooner did I do that when I realized that I just added an extra 1/2 cup of liquid to the recipe. Already committed, I poured very thin cake batter into my pans and held my breath as I watched my cake layers in the oven through the glass. The cake layers turned out beautifully, but how would they taste?
I did use pecans in the frosting. Abigail does not have a tree nut allergy, but given the high risk of cross-contamination, the peanut clinical trial guidelines require that tree nuts be removed from the participants diet. My parents have several large pecan trees in their backyard. We've talked to our doctor at Duke, and because there is no risk of cross-contamination, Abigail is allowed to eat pecans from their trees.
Here's how the cake turned out.
And how did it taste? Incredible. It's the most moist chocolate cake I've had in a really long time! Yeah, another successful cake baked! Happy Birthday to my wonderful husband!
**Just a note about the Dr. Oetker cake mix. There was no allergen cautionary label on the box, and I haven't been able to find any information on their website. In hindsight, I shouldn't have allowed Abigail to eat a piece until I knew for certain. It's a Canadian company, and they're usually really good about labeling. I'll contact them and find out.
We've been on a strict avoidance of all peanut products since my daughter was diagnosed with an allergy at 18 months. Abigail is now 9 and our family is blessed to be participating in a Clinical Trial at Duke Hospital (now UNC Hospital). Reading every label on every food item I purchase has also given me a strong sense of what it takes to eat healthy. So, here's our journey to eating healthy and becoming peanut allergy free!
Showing posts with label organic. Show all posts
Showing posts with label organic. Show all posts
Wednesday, December 7, 2011
Sunday, September 4, 2011
Healthy Lunches
I was reading an article in the Natural Awakenings Magazine recently about school lunch nutrition when I came across a staggering statistic. In an interview with Chef Ann, author of several books and advocate for improving student menu plans, I read that "some studies indicate that children born in 2000 may die at a younger age than their parents because of the food they eat." Is that not a mouth-dropping statistic?
Apparently, it was a prognostication made by the Centers for Disease Control. I searched the CDC website last night, and couldn't find reference to the study. I would have liked to have read or least skimmed the study in its entirety.
Here's another statistic for us parents with young girls. From Michigan State University, "girls eating a high-fat diet during puberty, even those who do not become overweight or obese, may be at a greater risk of developing breast cancer later in life." What our kids eat now is definitely setting the foundation for their health as adults.
I've often joined Abigail for lunch and have seen what they serve in the cafeteria... pizza, nachos, mac 'n cheese, chicken patties, burgers, hot dogs, french fries, tater tots and chocolate milk. I understand that for many children in this country, this is the best meal they're going to eat in a given day. I also understand that it needs to be inexpensive. But, does it have to be highly processed, high in fat, salt and sugar, full of genetically modified ingredients and additives? These foods lead to cancer, obesity, diabetes, heart disease, high blood pressure and strokes. Should we not look hard at that statistic and invest in our children and their future? We don't live in a 3rd world country. Why should our life expectancy be on the decline?
Now, in case you are sitting there thinking that you ate pizza, french fries and drank chocolate milk when you were in school and you are in good shape and healthy, let me just say that you ate real pizza and french fries and drank real milk. That's the difference. There is nothing real about what is served in most cafeterias or packed in most lunchboxes. 1996 was the year that genetically modified/ engineered soy was introduced. By the year 2000 (note the year), 54% of all soybeans harvested in the US were genetically modified up from 7% in 1996. GMO corn made up 25% of the corn harvested in 2000. That's up from 1.5% in 1996. These numbers have done nothing but climb. Think high fructose corn syrup, partially hydrogenated oil, canola & vegetable oil, modified food starch, maltodextrin, soy lecithin to name just a few. All ingredients commonly found in our food, and unless organic, all derived from genetically modified crops. Don't forget the milk and cheese. 1994 was the year rbST was introduced. By 2000, approximately 1/3 of dairy cows were in herds supplemented with rbST.
I only let Abigail purchase lunch from the cafeteria one day a week. On that day I even encourage her to take her water bottle as opposed to purchasing a milk. If I had my way, she wouldn't eat from the cafeteria at all. Don't get me wrong, packing lunch is no picnic at our house either. Abigail has to pack the majority of it, and would go without rather than having to take the time to put together something of substance.
She would also live off of starches and carbohydrates if I let her. Crackers, chips, snack bars, pretzels and pastas are about all she wants to eat. That and dairy in the form of cheese and yogurt. Per my insistence, a typical packed lunch consists of a slice or two of ham or pepperoni (both organic), cheese stick (rbST-free) and crackers (GMO/additive-free). If I have dip she'll eat a couple of carrots so I make an organic ranch dip. I also insist on a fruit and purchase fruit cups in natural juice with no color or sugar additives. Snack is usually pretzels or crackers, cereal or fruit bars (also all GMO/additive-free). One day a week, I'll heat up mac 'n cheese or toast some mini-pizzas to send in a thermos. I try to keep a lot of other options in the pantry and the fridge, but this is what she chooses day in and day out. If she could, she'd eat the cafeteria food every day. She's not worried about breast cancer, diabetes, heart disease and the like. That's my job. Educate her now, condition her to eating healthy now in hopes of it becoming an adult practice. And, that one day a week in the cafeteria? It's my attempt to loosen the reins a bit and not create resentment over the contents (or lack of) in our pantry.
For more reading on GMO foods, rbST and healthy eating, check out the links on either side of the blog posts. Here are links that I used to get my statistics on year 2000 usages of GMO foods and rbST.
Apparently, it was a prognostication made by the Centers for Disease Control. I searched the CDC website last night, and couldn't find reference to the study. I would have liked to have read or least skimmed the study in its entirety.
Here's another statistic for us parents with young girls. From Michigan State University, "girls eating a high-fat diet during puberty, even those who do not become overweight or obese, may be at a greater risk of developing breast cancer later in life." What our kids eat now is definitely setting the foundation for their health as adults.
I've often joined Abigail for lunch and have seen what they serve in the cafeteria... pizza, nachos, mac 'n cheese, chicken patties, burgers, hot dogs, french fries, tater tots and chocolate milk. I understand that for many children in this country, this is the best meal they're going to eat in a given day. I also understand that it needs to be inexpensive. But, does it have to be highly processed, high in fat, salt and sugar, full of genetically modified ingredients and additives? These foods lead to cancer, obesity, diabetes, heart disease, high blood pressure and strokes. Should we not look hard at that statistic and invest in our children and their future? We don't live in a 3rd world country. Why should our life expectancy be on the decline?
Now, in case you are sitting there thinking that you ate pizza, french fries and drank chocolate milk when you were in school and you are in good shape and healthy, let me just say that you ate real pizza and french fries and drank real milk. That's the difference. There is nothing real about what is served in most cafeterias or packed in most lunchboxes. 1996 was the year that genetically modified/ engineered soy was introduced. By the year 2000 (note the year), 54% of all soybeans harvested in the US were genetically modified up from 7% in 1996. GMO corn made up 25% of the corn harvested in 2000. That's up from 1.5% in 1996. These numbers have done nothing but climb. Think high fructose corn syrup, partially hydrogenated oil, canola & vegetable oil, modified food starch, maltodextrin, soy lecithin to name just a few. All ingredients commonly found in our food, and unless organic, all derived from genetically modified crops. Don't forget the milk and cheese. 1994 was the year rbST was introduced. By 2000, approximately 1/3 of dairy cows were in herds supplemented with rbST.
I only let Abigail purchase lunch from the cafeteria one day a week. On that day I even encourage her to take her water bottle as opposed to purchasing a milk. If I had my way, she wouldn't eat from the cafeteria at all. Don't get me wrong, packing lunch is no picnic at our house either. Abigail has to pack the majority of it, and would go without rather than having to take the time to put together something of substance.
She would also live off of starches and carbohydrates if I let her. Crackers, chips, snack bars, pretzels and pastas are about all she wants to eat. That and dairy in the form of cheese and yogurt. Per my insistence, a typical packed lunch consists of a slice or two of ham or pepperoni (both organic), cheese stick (rbST-free) and crackers (GMO/additive-free). If I have dip she'll eat a couple of carrots so I make an organic ranch dip. I also insist on a fruit and purchase fruit cups in natural juice with no color or sugar additives. Snack is usually pretzels or crackers, cereal or fruit bars (also all GMO/additive-free). One day a week, I'll heat up mac 'n cheese or toast some mini-pizzas to send in a thermos. I try to keep a lot of other options in the pantry and the fridge, but this is what she chooses day in and day out. If she could, she'd eat the cafeteria food every day. She's not worried about breast cancer, diabetes, heart disease and the like. That's my job. Educate her now, condition her to eating healthy now in hopes of it becoming an adult practice. And, that one day a week in the cafeteria? It's my attempt to loosen the reins a bit and not create resentment over the contents (or lack of) in our pantry.
For more reading on GMO foods, rbST and healthy eating, check out the links on either side of the blog posts. Here are links that I used to get my statistics on year 2000 usages of GMO foods and rbST.
Monday, May 2, 2011
Please Label GM Ingredients!
| My Favorite! |
On the other hand though, I've been super worked up about the use of genetically modified ingredients and there not being a legal requirement for companies to label these ingredients. In order to find out if Ben & Jerry's used GM ingredients, I had to do significant searching on their website. As parents of allergic children, we're used to constantly contacting food manufacturers, so we all know it's a time-consuming process. Now add to that finding a company's policy on the use of genetically modified ingredients. It's no longer about just trying to avoid peanuts and tree nuts to keep Abigail safe, it's now also about trying to protect the health of my whole family.
There is a big movement right now in the organic community to pressure stores to insist their food suppliers label foods. I think the realization is that we can't depend on our government to force the issue by passing a law. I did do my part though by contacting my state representatives. The target store right now is Whole Foods. According to the article, "Organic Elite Surrenders to Monsanto," by Ronnie Cummings who writes for the Organic Consumers Association, "a self-appointed cabal of the Organic Elite, spearheaded by Whole Foods Market, Organic Valley and Stonyfield Farm, has decided it’s time to surrender to Monsanto. Top executives from these companies have publicly admitted that they no longer oppose the mass commercialization of genetically engineered crops, such as Monsanto’s controversial Roundup Ready alfalfa, and are prepared to sit down and cut a deal for “coexistence” with Monsanto and USDA biotech cheerleader Tom Vilsack."
What's the main reason Whole Foods surrendered? According to the same article, "Whole Foods is pleading for coexistence with Monsanto, Dow, Bayer, Syngenta, BASF and the rest of the biotech bullies, because they desperately want the controversy surrounding genetically engineered foods and crops to go away. Why? Because they know, just as we do, that 2/3rd's of WFM’s $9 billion annual sales is derived from so-called “natural” processed foods and animal products that are contaminated with GMOs."
Here's a YouTube clip of a protester trying to get answers at a Whole Foods as to what products contained genetically modified ingredients. Her point... if you'd require labeling, consumers could make educated purchasing decisions and the store employees would know what they were selling. However, as a Monsanto executive stated, If you put a label on genetically engineered food you might as well put a skull and crossbones on it.
If you're unclear abut the "natural" versus organic labeling, here's a link to an older post on my blog to get you started.
Back to to Ben & Jerry's. While they do use GM ingredients for their US products (they've re-formulated the European flavors because of it's GMO-free requirements), they are actively, and have been for years, trying to find alternatives to GM soy and corn ingredients. Per their website, "Our goal is to be GMO-free in both our domestic and international products. Some of the issues we are confronting at the present time are the availability of a non-GMO supply of alternatives such as corn syrup and add-ins such as candies, and certification of those supplies. Currently we cannot obtain secure free assurances from all of our suppliers." I've got to give them some credit for trying!
Wednesday, April 27, 2011
Organic Chocolate Syrup
I've been using this syrup to make my kids' chocolate milk now for a while. I've also been known to put it over vanilla ice cream for a quick treat. It's organic, dairy-free, gluten-free, sodium-free and best of all, peanut-free. And, yes, it's good.
I buy the chocolate syrup at a local store that specializes in organic products, but it's also available for purchase online. Unfortuantely, it's the only product from AH!LASKA that is made in a peanut/tree nut free facility. They also make cocoa powder for hot drinks and baker's cocoa, but these are made in a facility with other peanut products.
I buy the chocolate syrup at a local store that specializes in organic products, but it's also available for purchase online. Unfortuantely, it's the only product from AH!LASKA that is made in a peanut/tree nut free facility. They also make cocoa powder for hot drinks and baker's cocoa, but these are made in a facility with other peanut products.
Sunday, May 30, 2010
My Gardens
It's in full bloom. My yard that is. Last year, I tried my hand at gardening, organic, of course, and found I really enjoyed it. Knowing that I had time and space constraints, I chose to try my hand at square foot gardening. It was the perfect solution. This year in my 3 foot by 12 foot space, I am growing 4 types of heirloom tomatoes, green peppers, jalapeno peppers, okra, squash, zucchini, spinach, broccoli, swiss chard, basil and dill. In pots around my garden, I'm growing pickling cucumbers, bush cucumbers, habanero peppers and cherry tomatoes. I wanted more squash and zucchini this year so I added another small 2 foot by 6 foot garden put in each of those as well as a cantaloupe and several banana pepper plants.
My herb garden is on my deck. I have dill, basil, rosemary, thyme, lemon thyme, parsley, bee balm, chives and lettuce. After several years, this is the first year that my blueberry plant flowered and produced berries. I'm watching to make sure I get the ripened berries before the birds do. This spring, my mom gave me a blackberry bush to add to my collection. Told you. I'm loving it.
And a surprise this year...I have a few plants growing in my make-shift compost pile. I'm guessing they're squash and from the looks of them, they really like it there.
We ate fresh veggies all summer last year, and I even had enough to put a few things in the freezer. I think I'm going to try my hand at pickling and canning this summer. I found several recipes for pickles that call for freezing your jars instead of using a hot water bath or a pressure cooker. Sounds perfect!
If you haven't started a vegetable garden, and want to, it's not too late. You really should check out square foot gardening. It's fast and easy. We made our raised bed frames with a couple of inexpensive 2 x 6 boards. I put up a fence for protection against the rabbits and my 2 year old (he likes to help....maybe a bit too much). If you have no inclination for gardening, then check out this guide to pesticides. It tells which fruits and vegetables you should purchase organic and which ones are the lowest in pesticides. Did you know that only 5% of the world's farmland is dedicated to organic farming? So, if you can, support your local organic farmers by shopping your Farmer's Markets and local produce stands.
My herb garden is on my deck. I have dill, basil, rosemary, thyme, lemon thyme, parsley, bee balm, chives and lettuce. After several years, this is the first year that my blueberry plant flowered and produced berries. I'm watching to make sure I get the ripened berries before the birds do. This spring, my mom gave me a blackberry bush to add to my collection. Told you. I'm loving it.And a surprise this year...I have a few plants growing in my make-shift compost pile. I'm guessing they're squash and from the looks of them, they really like it there.
We ate fresh veggies all summer last year, and I even had enough to put a few things in the freezer. I think I'm going to try my hand at pickling and canning this summer. I found several recipes for pickles that call for freezing your jars instead of using a hot water bath or a pressure cooker. Sounds perfect!
If you haven't started a vegetable garden, and want to, it's not too late. You really should check out square foot gardening. It's fast and easy. We made our raised bed frames with a couple of inexpensive 2 x 6 boards. I put up a fence for protection against the rabbits and my 2 year old (he likes to help....maybe a bit too much). If you have no inclination for gardening, then check out this guide to pesticides. It tells which fruits and vegetables you should purchase organic and which ones are the lowest in pesticides. Did you know that only 5% of the world's farmland is dedicated to organic farming? So, if you can, support your local organic farmers by shopping your Farmer's Markets and local produce stands.
Labels:
gardening,
organic,
pesticides
Tuesday, February 2, 2010
Healthy Change #10: Avoid Genetically Modified Foods
Well, I've put off writing the 10th and final change in my "Ten Changes to Make for Healthier Living" series as long as possible. It's now the first of February, and I can no longer procrastinate. For me, it's the hardest of all the changes, not just writing about, but also following. I barely have a handle on this change myself.
Change #10: Avoid Genetically Modified Foods
In order to make crops more resistant to disease, weeds and pest, more tolerant to drought and cold weather and more nutritious, many have been genetically modified. Genetically Modified (GM) Food has been unnaturally altered by inserting genetic fragments (DNA) from one organism to another. According to the World Health Organization, the inserted DNA is usually from a different species. The genes can be taken from bacteria, viruses, insects, animals and even humans.
Other than the fact that we are not eating food in it's true form, why avoid foods that have been genetically modified? According to the Academy of Environmental Medicine, "GM foods pose a serious health risk in the areas of toxicology, allergy and immune function, reproductive health, and metabolic, physiologic and genetic health and are without benefit." Just last month, The Huffington Post wrote of a study linking GM food to organ failure.
But beyond the food we eat, there is a serious impact to the environment. The Center for Food Safety (CFS) outlines the environmental impacts to include an "uncontrolled biological pollution, threatening numerous microbial, plant and animal species with extinction, and a potential contamination of all non-genetically engineered life forms with novel and possibly hazardous genetic material."
Change #10: Avoid Genetically Modified Foods
In order to make crops more resistant to disease, weeds and pest, more tolerant to drought and cold weather and more nutritious, many have been genetically modified. Genetically Modified (GM) Food has been unnaturally altered by inserting genetic fragments (DNA) from one organism to another. According to the World Health Organization, the inserted DNA is usually from a different species. The genes can be taken from bacteria, viruses, insects, animals and even humans.
Other than the fact that we are not eating food in it's true form, why avoid foods that have been genetically modified? According to the Academy of Environmental Medicine, "GM foods pose a serious health risk in the areas of toxicology, allergy and immune function, reproductive health, and metabolic, physiologic and genetic health and are without benefit." Just last month, The Huffington Post wrote of a study linking GM food to organ failure.
But beyond the food we eat, there is a serious impact to the environment. The Center for Food Safety (CFS) outlines the environmental impacts to include an "uncontrolled biological pollution, threatening numerous microbial, plant and animal species with extinction, and a potential contamination of all non-genetically engineered life forms with novel and possibly hazardous genetic material."
The US doesn't require food manufacturers to label GMO products so it's difficult to know which foods have been altered. I've read that there is an estimated 30,000 foods found on grocery store shelves that contain a GM ingredient or 75% of processed foods in the US. DisabledWorld.com reported that from 1995 to 2005, total worldwide land surface growing GMO crops increased from 4.2 million acres to 222 million acres.
There are many GM foods, but five account for the highest volume of food and food ingredients. The CFS reports that "currently, up to 85 percent of US corn is genetically engineered as are 91 percent of soybeans and 88 percent of cotton (cottonseed oil is used in food products)." Canola is one of the top five, and newly added is sugar beets. Some examples of these GMO products:
Corn - corn flour, meal, oil, starch & syrup, sweetners (fructose, glucose), modified food starch
Soy - soy flour, lecithin, vegetable oil, soy beverages, tofu
Cotton - cottonseed oil
Canola - canola oil
Sugar Beets - any sweetener not labeled 100% cane sugar, evaporated cane juice or organic sugar
Unless the product package specifies that the food is non-GMO, then you can assume that if it has one of these ingredients, then it's been genetically modified. The best list of GMO crops I've found is on DisabledWorld.com. Here's an incredible Non-GMO Shopping Guide. It lists products by brands, includes brands that do use GMO ingredients and lists a ton of "hidden" GMO ingredients.
There are many GM foods, but five account for the highest volume of food and food ingredients. The CFS reports that "currently, up to 85 percent of US corn is genetically engineered as are 91 percent of soybeans and 88 percent of cotton (cottonseed oil is used in food products)." Canola is one of the top five, and newly added is sugar beets. Some examples of these GMO products:
Corn - corn flour, meal, oil, starch & syrup, sweetners (fructose, glucose), modified food starch
Soy - soy flour, lecithin, vegetable oil, soy beverages, tofu
Cotton - cottonseed oil
Canola - canola oil
Sugar Beets - any sweetener not labeled 100% cane sugar, evaporated cane juice or organic sugar
Unless the product package specifies that the food is non-GMO, then you can assume that if it has one of these ingredients, then it's been genetically modified. The best list of GMO crops I've found is on DisabledWorld.com. Here's an incredible Non-GMO Shopping Guide. It lists products by brands, includes brands that do use GMO ingredients and lists a ton of "hidden" GMO ingredients.
What's most difficult for me, is that I can't seem to avoid GMO foods without making drastic and unwanted changes to our shopping and eating habits. In fact, it makes me downright angry to find out that we've been human guinea pigs for years now, and that I've unknowingly feed my family these foods. It's possible that the soy formula and milk that Abigail drank from 7 months of age to the age of 2 could very well be the cause of her peanut allergy. Since 1996, when GMO's hit the mainstream food supply, food allergies and chronic diseases have doubled. From what I am reading, there is not adequate testing, our government is leaving it up to big business to determine what's safe and what's not, other countries' governments have long since realized that there is a serious health risk and are imposing regulations while big business is doing everything in it's power to shut down the small farmers who want to avoid the use of genetically modified seeds for their crops.
NaturalNews.com has created a good list of ways to avoid GMO foods. Obviously, eating organic is the easiest. Using the shopping guide I mentioned above is helpful, but frustrating. The products tend to be more expensive and many aren't safe for our household because of the risk of cross-contamination with peanuts/tree nuts. I've done a few things like purchase organic produce, rice and canned goods, switched to Safflower Oil for cooking, purchase Kashi crackers and cereal, and Kettle potato chips. Trader Joes is another source for non-GMO snacks. However, I've got a really long way to go!
Here are a few more links if you want to do a little more reading.
Here are a few more links if you want to do a little more reading.
Labels:
GMO food,
healthy changes,
organic
Saturday, January 30, 2010
Snow Day Requirement
It's snowing! And, has been since yesterday afternoon! We've had some sleet, but mostly, just snow. It's wonderful. Where we live in North Carolina, we often get freezing rain, but not inches of nice, powdery snow. We're up to about 6 inches and counting. It's been years since we've had this much. The kids have already been outside and are now back in warming up. Abigail's first request upon entering the house was for hot chocolate.
I didn't have any packets of hot cocoa so we improvised. It actually turned out really good, and I don't mind at all that Abigail drank the whole mug. I purchase organic chocolate soy milk for my 2 year old son to drink at lunch. I heated a mug of the milk in the microwave for 45 seconds, stirred it and then heated it again for another 45 seconds. Topped with a couple of marshmallows, it was not only a very rich cup of hot chocolate, but probably more nutritious than any of the powdered kind.
Recently, I contacted Nestle about their hot cocoa. Abigail's class was having it for a treat one day at school, and I needed to find out if it was safe for her peanut allergy. Here's an excerpt from their response:
There is no risk of peanut or tree nut contamination in our cocoa products.....
Factories that use a critical allergen as an ingredient take all precautions to avoid cross-contact of products that do not normally contain these allergens and products that do not carry a specific mention in the ingredient statement. Precautionary measures include efficient cleaning of production lines and equipment and strict separation of materials that may contain critical allergens. If an allergen does not appear on the ingredient statement, then it has not been added to the product and the likelihood of cross-contact is so extremely low that the risk is insignificant.
Please note that ingredients and manufacturing conditions can and do change. If you do need to pay attention to allergens in your diet, we strongly encourage you to always check the product label and the list of ingredients.
Now that I know I can just heat up our organic soy milk, I won't be purchasing any more "snow day" packets of cocoa mix. They're too "processed" anyway. But, I do have a question. How do you moms that have kids with life-threatening nut allergies, or you adults with an allergy, feel about that statement "the likelihood of cross-contact is so extremely low that the risk is insignificant"? I ask because I feel it's a "CYA" statement from Nestle. But mostly, I ask because when I initially read the statement, my first thought was that any risk was too much. I then started thinking that I'm just being over-the-top cautious (and many would think I was). In this case, I let Abigail drink the hot chocolate at school, but I did so hesitantly. So, if you have an allergy in your household, I'd really like to hear your opinion. Too risky? Or not?
One side note for purchasers of soy milk. The "Silk" brand soy milk is no longer organic. Dean Foods, the new owner of the "Silk" brand removed the "organic" label on the packaging without alerting the public. They state on their website, that the "Silk" product is not made with genetically modified soybeans, however there is a large movement in the organic community to boycott this brand. Organizations like the The Cornucopia Institute are stating that Dean Foods are using conventional soy beans from China, not disclosing important information and are purposely trying to confuse consumers. Something to consider.
For those of you with snow...hope you are having fun too!
I didn't have any packets of hot cocoa so we improvised. It actually turned out really good, and I don't mind at all that Abigail drank the whole mug. I purchase organic chocolate soy milk for my 2 year old son to drink at lunch. I heated a mug of the milk in the microwave for 45 seconds, stirred it and then heated it again for another 45 seconds. Topped with a couple of marshmallows, it was not only a very rich cup of hot chocolate, but probably more nutritious than any of the powdered kind.
Recently, I contacted Nestle about their hot cocoa. Abigail's class was having it for a treat one day at school, and I needed to find out if it was safe for her peanut allergy. Here's an excerpt from their response:
There is no risk of peanut or tree nut contamination in our cocoa products.....
Factories that use a critical allergen as an ingredient take all precautions to avoid cross-contact of products that do not normally contain these allergens and products that do not carry a specific mention in the ingredient statement. Precautionary measures include efficient cleaning of production lines and equipment and strict separation of materials that may contain critical allergens. If an allergen does not appear on the ingredient statement, then it has not been added to the product and the likelihood of cross-contact is so extremely low that the risk is insignificant.
Please note that ingredients and manufacturing conditions can and do change. If you do need to pay attention to allergens in your diet, we strongly encourage you to always check the product label and the list of ingredients.
Now that I know I can just heat up our organic soy milk, I won't be purchasing any more "snow day" packets of cocoa mix. They're too "processed" anyway. But, I do have a question. How do you moms that have kids with life-threatening nut allergies, or you adults with an allergy, feel about that statement "the likelihood of cross-contact is so extremely low that the risk is insignificant"? I ask because I feel it's a "CYA" statement from Nestle. But mostly, I ask because when I initially read the statement, my first thought was that any risk was too much. I then started thinking that I'm just being over-the-top cautious (and many would think I was). In this case, I let Abigail drink the hot chocolate at school, but I did so hesitantly. So, if you have an allergy in your household, I'd really like to hear your opinion. Too risky? Or not?
One side note for purchasers of soy milk. The "Silk" brand soy milk is no longer organic. Dean Foods, the new owner of the "Silk" brand removed the "organic" label on the packaging without alerting the public. They state on their website, that the "Silk" product is not made with genetically modified soybeans, however there is a large movement in the organic community to boycott this brand. Organizations like the The Cornucopia Institute are stating that Dean Foods are using conventional soy beans from China, not disclosing important information and are purposely trying to confuse consumers. Something to consider.
For those of you with snow...hope you are having fun too!
Labels:
allergen labeling,
Nestle,
organic,
peanut allergy,
soy milk
Tuesday, January 19, 2010
Healthy Change #8: Natural vs. Organic Meat
A couple of days earlier I touched on the difference between "Organic" and "Natural". I also mentioned that I purchase a combination of both. Meat is one of those items that I tend to purchase "Natural." For one, I haven't come across true "Organic" meat in my shopping expeditions. Second, the dangers of meat that I most want to avoid seem to be addressed in some of the "Natural" brands.
I'm attaching a link to an article entitled, "Why Eat Organic Meat?" When I purchase meat, I want to avoid antibiotics, added growth hormones and artificial ingredients as well as I want my meat to have had a vegetarian diet and be minimally processed. If I am purchasing a pork product, then I also look for products that do not contain nitrates. From what I can tell in this article, by not purchasing certified organic, I assume a greater risk of getting meat with BSE or mad-cow disease. I also am buying meat that is processed with a lot less regulation. So, there are trade-offs.
I thought I'd give you a couple of brands that I stick to. If you have a few or know of an issue with the brands I mention, please leave a comment.
I like to keep ground beef on hand in the freezer for soups, sauces, casseroles, and of course, hamburgers. I purchase Laura's Lean Beef as well as Harris Teeter's Natural brand. Neither are certified organic. I usually end up paying around $4.99/lb. Occasionally, I can find it on sale for $3.99.
I've switched to Hormel Natural Choice for sandwich meat and bacon. I can find the sandwich meat pretty much everywhere. I purchase the bacon at Super Target which has the best price at $3.49 versus $5.25 at Harris Teeter. We swear we can taste the difference in the bacon!
John Morrell's Bistro Naturals is a really good brand of hot dogs. The hot dogs are also gluten free and contain no MSG. The cost $4.25 at Harris Teeter. I used to be able to purchase Bistro Naturals link sausage, but Harris Teeter (the only store I've found to carry the sausage) discontinued it due to lack of sales. Now, the only place I can find a natural sausage link is Trader Joe's.
I'd like to state that I'm not compensated by any of these brands. I mention them simply because I've done the research, used the product and my family likes the taste. But....if a company ever wants to send me their product to review...I'll definitely do that. Just be prepared for an honest one!
There's just one more day to enter my give-away so be sure to take a minute and do so!
I'm attaching a link to an article entitled, "Why Eat Organic Meat?" When I purchase meat, I want to avoid antibiotics, added growth hormones and artificial ingredients as well as I want my meat to have had a vegetarian diet and be minimally processed. If I am purchasing a pork product, then I also look for products that do not contain nitrates. From what I can tell in this article, by not purchasing certified organic, I assume a greater risk of getting meat with BSE or mad-cow disease. I also am buying meat that is processed with a lot less regulation. So, there are trade-offs.
I thought I'd give you a couple of brands that I stick to. If you have a few or know of an issue with the brands I mention, please leave a comment.
I like to keep ground beef on hand in the freezer for soups, sauces, casseroles, and of course, hamburgers. I purchase Laura's Lean Beef as well as Harris Teeter's Natural brand. Neither are certified organic. I usually end up paying around $4.99/lb. Occasionally, I can find it on sale for $3.99.
I've switched to Hormel Natural Choice for sandwich meat and bacon. I can find the sandwich meat pretty much everywhere. I purchase the bacon at Super Target which has the best price at $3.49 versus $5.25 at Harris Teeter. We swear we can taste the difference in the bacon!
John Morrell's Bistro Naturals is a really good brand of hot dogs. The hot dogs are also gluten free and contain no MSG. The cost $4.25 at Harris Teeter. I used to be able to purchase Bistro Naturals link sausage, but Harris Teeter (the only store I've found to carry the sausage) discontinued it due to lack of sales. Now, the only place I can find a natural sausage link is Trader Joe's.
I'd like to state that I'm not compensated by any of these brands. I mention them simply because I've done the research, used the product and my family likes the taste. But....if a company ever wants to send me their product to review...I'll definitely do that. Just be prepared for an honest one!
There's just one more day to enter my give-away so be sure to take a minute and do so!
Labels:
healthy changes,
natural labeling,
organic
Friday, January 15, 2010
Healthy Change #4: Chicken Safety 101
Maybe I should title this "Chicken Safety 102" because cooks everywhere understand the importance of storing and handling chicken. But that's after we get it home to our own kitchens. What about while it's at the store?
Consumer Reports tested hundreds of chickens at stores across the nation and found that two-thirds of the chickens harbored either one or both of the bacterias that cause campylobacter and salmonella. The cleanest chicken they found was "air-chilled" organic chicken (about 60% tested were clean). Just another reason to purchase organic! Here's something I learned in the report. "Air-chilled" is a process where carcasses are refrigerated and misted rather than dunked in cold, chlorinated water. Chlorinated water? Did you know that chicken was bathed in chlorinated water? I didn't!
Here's another scary fact. Out of those hundreds of chickens tested, 68% percent of the salmonella and 60% of the campylobacter bacteria was resistant to one or more antibiotics. My 2 1/2 year old son is prone to upper respiratory infections. He's been on more antibiotics in his 2 1/2 years than I've taken my entire life. Tubes helped with the ear infections and now we battle sinus infections. The last one took 3 different antibiotics and almost 2 months to clear up. He definitely does not need more antibiotics in the foods he eats!
According to the CDC, approximately 3.4 million Americans suffer from eating chicken and other foods infected with salmonella and campylobacter, 25,500 end up in hospitals and 500 die. The USDA requires chicken to be tested for salmonella, but not campylobacter.
If you are interested in reading how individual chicken brands scored in the test as well as more tips on what you can do to until chicken becomes "cleaner", check out the GreenerChoices.org article on chicken safety.
Don't forget to enter my give-away for a free blender. No strings attached...promise!
Consumer Reports tested hundreds of chickens at stores across the nation and found that two-thirds of the chickens harbored either one or both of the bacterias that cause campylobacter and salmonella. The cleanest chicken they found was "air-chilled" organic chicken (about 60% tested were clean). Just another reason to purchase organic! Here's something I learned in the report. "Air-chilled" is a process where carcasses are refrigerated and misted rather than dunked in cold, chlorinated water. Chlorinated water? Did you know that chicken was bathed in chlorinated water? I didn't!
Here's another scary fact. Out of those hundreds of chickens tested, 68% percent of the salmonella and 60% of the campylobacter bacteria was resistant to one or more antibiotics. My 2 1/2 year old son is prone to upper respiratory infections. He's been on more antibiotics in his 2 1/2 years than I've taken my entire life. Tubes helped with the ear infections and now we battle sinus infections. The last one took 3 different antibiotics and almost 2 months to clear up. He definitely does not need more antibiotics in the foods he eats!
According to the CDC, approximately 3.4 million Americans suffer from eating chicken and other foods infected with salmonella and campylobacter, 25,500 end up in hospitals and 500 die. The USDA requires chicken to be tested for salmonella, but not campylobacter.
If you are interested in reading how individual chicken brands scored in the test as well as more tips on what you can do to until chicken becomes "cleaner", check out the GreenerChoices.org article on chicken safety.
Don't forget to enter my give-away for a free blender. No strings attached...promise!
Labels:
chicken safety,
healthy changes,
organic
Thursday, January 14, 2010
Healthy Change #3: Understand the "Natural" Label
True or False?
1. "Organic" foods are better for me?
2. Foods labeled "Organic" are usually more expensive?
3. "Natural" products are better for me than conventional products?
4. "Natural" products are just as good as "Organic" products?
Answers: 1. T, 2. T, 3. T, 4. F
I would expect that everyone got the first two answers correct. We've all heard about the benefits of eating organic foods. It's a huge and growing trend and even Wal-mart now has a good selection. Organic foods are usually more expensive, but the big box stores are helping drive the prices down. I imagine that you got question three correct, but what about the 4th question? Did you answer true or false?
In order for a product to be certified "Organic", it has to be produced under a strict set of guidelines and is regulated by the U.S. Department of Agriculture. The USDA only defines "Natural" for meat and poultry indicating that it has been "minimally processed", i.e., not injected to make it juicier/plumper and color has not been added. There is no regulation for the rest of the food industry leaving it up to the interpretation of the food producer.
"Natural" products aren't all that bad. They usually do not contain added hormones, artificial sweeteners, artificial colors, flavors, preservatives or high fructose corn syrup. So, yes, they are better for you than conventional products. However, if you want a food that is not produced with pesticides, herbicides, antibiotics or other drugs or genetically modified feed crops or from cows that are confined to factory farm feedlots, then you better stick to "organic."
So, the answer to number four is false. "Natural" is usually cheaper, but it's not better than "organic." My recommendation though is to find a good balance. I personally purchase quite a few "natural" products especially when an organic version is not available. Bottom line is take the time to read the back of the label and understand what you are eating.
Don't forget to enter the give-away!!
For more reading:
'Natural' On The Label Can Be Misleading
Looking Behind the 'Natural' Label
Manufacturers and consumers lose faith in natural label claims
1. "Organic" foods are better for me?
2. Foods labeled "Organic" are usually more expensive?
3. "Natural" products are better for me than conventional products?
4. "Natural" products are just as good as "Organic" products?
Answers: 1. T, 2. T, 3. T, 4. F
I would expect that everyone got the first two answers correct. We've all heard about the benefits of eating organic foods. It's a huge and growing trend and even Wal-mart now has a good selection. Organic foods are usually more expensive, but the big box stores are helping drive the prices down. I imagine that you got question three correct, but what about the 4th question? Did you answer true or false?
In order for a product to be certified "Organic", it has to be produced under a strict set of guidelines and is regulated by the U.S. Department of Agriculture. The USDA only defines "Natural" for meat and poultry indicating that it has been "minimally processed", i.e., not injected to make it juicier/plumper and color has not been added. There is no regulation for the rest of the food industry leaving it up to the interpretation of the food producer."Natural" products aren't all that bad. They usually do not contain added hormones, artificial sweeteners, artificial colors, flavors, preservatives or high fructose corn syrup. So, yes, they are better for you than conventional products. However, if you want a food that is not produced with pesticides, herbicides, antibiotics or other drugs or genetically modified feed crops or from cows that are confined to factory farm feedlots, then you better stick to "organic."
So, the answer to number four is false. "Natural" is usually cheaper, but it's not better than "organic." My recommendation though is to find a good balance. I personally purchase quite a few "natural" products especially when an organic version is not available. Bottom line is take the time to read the back of the label and understand what you are eating.
Don't forget to enter the give-away!!
For more reading:
'Natural' On The Label Can Be Misleading
Looking Behind the 'Natural' Label
Manufacturers and consumers lose faith in natural label claims
Labels:
healthy changes,
natural labeling,
organic
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)




