Grocery Shopping is no longer easy. Not that it's always been a walk in the park...especially those trips where both kids are with me. But, now that I'm reading labels not only for peanut allergens, but also for GMO's, rBST, artificial colors, sweeteners, etc., it's become a major, time-consuming effort. I've gotten pretty good about knowing what products meet our family guidelines. It's just that I can't purchase them all at one store. In fact, I now shop at seven different stores.
Our Sunday School class is doing the Crown Financial Study. My husband and I have started to take a close look at our day to day expenses. I was pleased to see that eating healthy hasn't increased our food expenditures by a huge amount. What was shocking was to see that I had made over 21 trips to a grocery store in a one month period. Quite frankly, I've got better things to do with my time!
Here's what's happening. I love Trader Joe's. The prices are very reasonable and their foods meet our healthy eating requirements. However, because of Abigail's peanut allergy, I can't purchase any of their breads, the majority of their boxed products (cereal, snack bars, etc.), a good many of their baking items, a lot of their frozen items or any of their cookies or other sweet treats. So, at Trader Joe's, I stock up on what I can, but that leaves a ton of items that I have to purchased elsewhere. They also have the best price on organic produce, but it's a 30 minute drive to the closest store so I only make the trip once a month. That leaves me looking for everything else we need at the other 6 stores that I shop.
I should explain that the reason we haven't seen a huge increase in our food budget even though we are purchasing organic, natural and peanut free is because I shop at so many different stores. For instance, I stop into Food Lion to purchase our Jone's Colas. They're just $2.99 versus $4.99 at Harris Teeter. Wal-Mart carries a few organic products and have the best prices on those items, but the selection is very limited. I go to BJ's for diapers and paper products. While Harris Teeter tends to be the most expensive on basics, they have the best selection and a few products that I can't find anywhere else. Fresh Market has the best price on certain organic produce items, and Target has rGBH-free dairy items that I purchase when I can't get to Trader Joe's. And, if a store does a special event with triple or double up to $1.99 coupons, I'm probably shopping there too. Don't laugh (my husband does), but I've had to create a spreadsheet to keep track of all of this.
So, what to do? This is going to be a stretch, but I'm going to try to plan a monthly menu. I've started this weekend working on just a 2 week menu and will work my way up to doing a month at a time. Considering that there are many evenings that I don't start figuring out what's for dinner until dinnertime, this is a big deal. Hopefully, the payoff will be big. My goal is to simplify my afternoons and decrease our food budget by purchasing in bulk. Mostly though, I want to gain lots of time by eliminating the 3 to 4 trips I make each week to grocery stores.
There are a lot of resources on the internet. Last night I found someone that put their meal calendars and shopping list templates online for upload. It's a good starting place. I also purchased a 5 ingredient crock pot cookbook. My kind of cooking! Now, I just need to take my menu and translate it into 6 different shopping lists! Wish me luck!
We've been on a strict avoidance of all peanut products since my daughter was diagnosed with an allergy at 18 months. Abigail is now 9 and our family is blessed to be participating in a Clinical Trial at Duke Hospital (now UNC Hospital). Reading every label on every food item I purchase has also given me a strong sense of what it takes to eat healthy. So, here's our journey to eating healthy and becoming peanut allergy free!
Sunday, February 21, 2010
Grocery Shopping Woes
Labels:
food labeling,
GMO food,
grocery shopping,
rBST/rBGH,
Trader Joe's
Wednesday, February 17, 2010
The Allergy March
It's amazing the information you can find on the internet. In doing some research, I found a clinical research trial that is currently being conducted at the Evelina Children's Hospital in London. It's called The LEAP Study, short for Learning Early About Peanut Allergy and is funded and sponsored by two US organizations, the Immune Tolerance Network and The National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases.
Health officials in the US, UK and Canada advise parents not to introduce peanut butter to their childrens' diet until around age 2 as a way to decrease the chances of developing a sensitivity/allergy to peanuts. Because our younger son is considered at risk for a peanut allergy based on family history, i.e., Abigail, we were told to wait even longer until he is 3. However, there are many countries where children eat peanut products from infancy on that do not show the high levels of peanut allergies as seen in Western countries. This study (which is now full) looks at these two schools of thought. Here's an excerpt from their site:
The majority of children have their first allergic reaction to peanut between 14 and 24 months of age. Children suffering from eczema or who are allergic to egg are at highest risk - these children have a 20% chance of going on to develop a peanut allergy.
The LEAP Study involves 640 such high-risk children who were enrolled in the study when aged 4-10 months. Each child was randomly assigned to follow one of the two approaches – avoidance or consumption. Children in the avoidance group avoid eating peanut-containing foods until they reach the age of three. In the consumption group, parents are asked to feed their child an age-appropriate peanut snack three times per week (equivalent to about 6 grams of peanut protein per week). All participants receive allergy testing, dietary counseling, physical examinations and will be asked to provide occasional blood samples that will be used to examine differences in immune system development in each of the study groups.
The proportion of each group that develops peanut allergy by 5 years of age will be used to determine which approach - avoidance or consumption - works best for preventing peanut allergy. We anticipate that the study will reach completion in 2013, at which time the results will be analyzed and published.
There is some great informative on their site, and if you are dealing with a peanut allergy, it's very much worth checking out. There is one topic that I wanted to point out. The site discusses the "Allergy March", which is a term they use to explain how allergic diseases progress throughout a person's life. According to the site, the Allergy March begins with eczema which is usually diagnosed within the first few months of life. In 1/3 to 1/2 of children, eczema is linked to an underlying food allergy. They go on to explain that food allergies appear in the first 3 years of life and that the development pattern of allergic diseases, the type
Health officials in the US, UK and Canada advise parents not to introduce peanut butter to their childrens' diet until around age 2 as a way to decrease the chances of developing a sensitivity/allergy to peanuts. Because our younger son is considered at risk for a peanut allergy based on family history, i.e., Abigail, we were told to wait even longer until he is 3. However, there are many countries where children eat peanut products from infancy on that do not show the high levels of peanut allergies as seen in Western countries. This study (which is now full) looks at these two schools of thought. Here's an excerpt from their site:
The majority of children have their first allergic reaction to peanut between 14 and 24 months of age. Children suffering from eczema or who are allergic to egg are at highest risk - these children have a 20% chance of going on to develop a peanut allergy.
The LEAP Study involves 640 such high-risk children who were enrolled in the study when aged 4-10 months. Each child was randomly assigned to follow one of the two approaches – avoidance or consumption. Children in the avoidance group avoid eating peanut-containing foods until they reach the age of three. In the consumption group, parents are asked to feed their child an age-appropriate peanut snack three times per week (equivalent to about 6 grams of peanut protein per week). All participants receive allergy testing, dietary counseling, physical examinations and will be asked to provide occasional blood samples that will be used to examine differences in immune system development in each of the study groups.
The proportion of each group that develops peanut allergy by 5 years of age will be used to determine which approach - avoidance or consumption - works best for preventing peanut allergy. We anticipate that the study will reach completion in 2013, at which time the results will be analyzed and published.
There is some great informative on their site, and if you are dealing with a peanut allergy, it's very much worth checking out. There is one topic that I wanted to point out. The site discusses the "Allergy March", which is a term they use to explain how allergic diseases progress throughout a person's life. According to the site, the Allergy March begins with eczema which is usually diagnosed within the first few months of life. In 1/3 to 1/2 of children, eczema is linked to an underlying food allergy. They go on to explain that food allergies appear in the first 3 years of life and that the development pattern of allergic diseases, the type
and age they occur, is the same in a large number of children. They do say that just because a child has eczema as an infant doesn't mean that they will go on to have a food allergy, but it does mean that they will have a higher risk of following this Allergic March. In fact, 20% of children with eczema do develop a peanut allergy.
I find this very interesting. Both my children had eczema as infants. I put a tiny amount of peanut butter on Abigail's lips at around 18 months of age. Less than 15 minutes later, her nose was pouring and she had hives. At around 2 to 3, she had numerous trips to the doctors for wheezing and ended up on Albuterol and Pulmicort. We were just one diagnosis away from Asthma when she appeared to out-grow it. We had our younger son tested at 18 months for food allergies. His blood test showed negative to everything. We allow him to eat foods that are manufactured in the same plant with peanut products, but at 2 1/2, he's still not had anything with peanuts as an ingredient. As an infant, he was very prone to ear infections and ended up with tubes. He now constantly has either a runny nose or is clearing his throat because of drainage. My gut tells me it's food related, but I can't prove it without doing an elimination diet.
I will be following this study closely. The results will come too late to benefit my family, but it will still be interesting to know if all along we've been doing the wrong thing by avoiding all peanut products in the infancy stage.
Sunday, February 14, 2010
Valentine's Day

I found this incredible sugar cookie recipe (peanut safe of course) on the internet last fall and use it every holiday to make cookies for the kids to decorate. I found it on someone's blog, but I didn't bookmark it so unfortunately I can't give her credit. I'm guessing though that her name is Rhonda because they're called Rhonda's Sugar Cookies. Here's the recipe (I use all organic ingredients):
3 cups all-purpose flour
1/2 teaspoon baking soda
1/4 teaspoon salt
1 cup butter
2 eggs
1 cup sugar
1 teaspoon vanilla
In a large bowl, sift together the flour, baking soda and salt. Add the butter and mix it like you would a pie crust. In another bowl, beat eggs. Add the sugar and vanilla and beat well. Pour this mixture in the bowl with the dry ingredients and blend. The dough will be a little crumbly, but I usually just knead it a little with my hands.
This recipe doesn't require you to refrigerate the dough, so it's ready to either roll out and cut with cookie cutters or shape into balls and flatten with a fork or glass dipped in sugar. The recipe calls for you to cook on an ungreased cookie sheet; however, I've recently discovered parchment paper and swear by it! Bake cookies at 350 degrees for approximately 9 minutes. Remove from pan and place on wire rack to cool. After they cookies have cooled, store them in an air-tight container. They also freeze well.
Happy Valentines Day! We've got some cookies to eat!
Labels:
recipe,
sugar cookie recipe,
Valentine's Day
Tuesday, February 9, 2010
14th Visit to Duke
We went to the Duke Clinical Research Unit yesterday. It was our 14th trip, and our first visit of 2010. We're in the maintenance phase so the purpose of our visit was not to get a dosage increase, but for our 3rd round of testing. It was a short visit, but a full one. Abigail had a skin prick test, about 7 vials of blood drawn and a saliva sample taken. All that warranted 3 escalator rides, 1 for each test, when we were done!
Let me start by saying that Abigail did absolutely fabulous!! Not one complaint! I did think it was cute when Abigail asked the nurse if she would only stick her once (last time it took 2 tries). She also watched and even helped change out the vials. I was very impressed and very proud. I should also thank the nurses. They're pros and their no nonsense approach really helps.
Abigail's skin prick test results were much worse than the time before. I do remember being told to expect the results to get worse before they get better so I'm not sure why the results of her 2nd prick test were much better than the 1st or the 3rd. I also had the opportunity to talk with our doctor about the food challenges. They've done 10 so far. He couldn't share specific results with me, but he did say that they were feeling good about what they were seeing. He also told me that based on what they were seeing, there was no plan to make any modifications to the study protocol.
There were a couple of other eventful happenings at this visit. I was able to meet another mom that I've been communicating with for several weeks. Her daughter was at Duke for her very first visit. She and I have been e-mailing back and forth discussing all aspects of the trial. She's had lots of questions, and I was able to give her a good amount of information. I'm hoping our discussions have been helpful as her family starts the journey to becoming peanut allergy free!
Another really cool part of our visit to Duke was that my mom came with us. Abigail and I loved having her spend the morning with us. After our appointment, we took Abigail to a birthday lunch at CiCi's Pizza and surprised her by having both my dad and sister meet us there. By the way, none of CiCi's products contain peanuts, are made with peanut oil or processed in a plant with peanuts.
All in all, it was a great trip. We don't have another appointment scheduled until the first of April when we go to discuss the details of our food challenge in May. We've got a long way to go yet, but I'm overcome with how blessed we are to be a part of this trial.
Let me start by saying that Abigail did absolutely fabulous!! Not one complaint! I did think it was cute when Abigail asked the nurse if she would only stick her once (last time it took 2 tries). She also watched and even helped change out the vials. I was very impressed and very proud. I should also thank the nurses. They're pros and their no nonsense approach really helps.
Abigail's skin prick test results were much worse than the time before. I do remember being told to expect the results to get worse before they get better so I'm not sure why the results of her 2nd prick test were much better than the 1st or the 3rd. I also had the opportunity to talk with our doctor about the food challenges. They've done 10 so far. He couldn't share specific results with me, but he did say that they were feeling good about what they were seeing. He also told me that based on what they were seeing, there was no plan to make any modifications to the study protocol.
There were a couple of other eventful happenings at this visit. I was able to meet another mom that I've been communicating with for several weeks. Her daughter was at Duke for her very first visit. She and I have been e-mailing back and forth discussing all aspects of the trial. She's had lots of questions, and I was able to give her a good amount of information. I'm hoping our discussions have been helpful as her family starts the journey to becoming peanut allergy free!
Another really cool part of our visit to Duke was that my mom came with us. Abigail and I loved having her spend the morning with us. After our appointment, we took Abigail to a birthday lunch at CiCi's Pizza and surprised her by having both my dad and sister meet us there. By the way, none of CiCi's products contain peanuts, are made with peanut oil or processed in a plant with peanuts.
All in all, it was a great trip. We don't have another appointment scheduled until the first of April when we go to discuss the details of our food challenge in May. We've got a long way to go yet, but I'm overcome with how blessed we are to be a part of this trial.
Saturday, February 6, 2010
Happy Birthday Abigail!
Happy 7th Birthday Abigail!
Yesterday was Abigail's 7th birthday. It was a big day involving sweet treats, gifts, parties and lots of little girls running around our house screaming!
The day started by taking treats to school. This is always tricky because the sweets have to be store bought. I've found a grocery store that carries cupcakes from Freed's Bakery which are peanut/tree nut safe. However, due to a conflict, we had to bring our treat at morning snack. Abigail wanted doughnuts. Well, as already posted, neither Krispy Kreme nor Dunkin Doughnuts are safe. I was stumped at what to bring, but finally remembered the "Sweet 16" powdered doughnuts.


So, darling Abigail, Happy Birthday! I love you!
Tuesday, February 2, 2010
Healthy Change #10: Avoid Genetically Modified Foods
Well, I've put off writing the 10th and final change in my "Ten Changes to Make for Healthier Living" series as long as possible. It's now the first of February, and I can no longer procrastinate. For me, it's the hardest of all the changes, not just writing about, but also following. I barely have a handle on this change myself.
Change #10: Avoid Genetically Modified Foods
In order to make crops more resistant to disease, weeds and pest, more tolerant to drought and cold weather and more nutritious, many have been genetically modified. Genetically Modified (GM) Food has been unnaturally altered by inserting genetic fragments (DNA) from one organism to another. According to the World Health Organization, the inserted DNA is usually from a different species. The genes can be taken from bacteria, viruses, insects, animals and even humans.
Other than the fact that we are not eating food in it's true form, why avoid foods that have been genetically modified? According to the Academy of Environmental Medicine, "GM foods pose a serious health risk in the areas of toxicology, allergy and immune function, reproductive health, and metabolic, physiologic and genetic health and are without benefit." Just last month, The Huffington Post wrote of a study linking GM food to organ failure.
But beyond the food we eat, there is a serious impact to the environment. The Center for Food Safety (CFS) outlines the environmental impacts to include an "uncontrolled biological pollution, threatening numerous microbial, plant and animal species with extinction, and a potential contamination of all non-genetically engineered life forms with novel and possibly hazardous genetic material."
Change #10: Avoid Genetically Modified Foods
In order to make crops more resistant to disease, weeds and pest, more tolerant to drought and cold weather and more nutritious, many have been genetically modified. Genetically Modified (GM) Food has been unnaturally altered by inserting genetic fragments (DNA) from one organism to another. According to the World Health Organization, the inserted DNA is usually from a different species. The genes can be taken from bacteria, viruses, insects, animals and even humans.
Other than the fact that we are not eating food in it's true form, why avoid foods that have been genetically modified? According to the Academy of Environmental Medicine, "GM foods pose a serious health risk in the areas of toxicology, allergy and immune function, reproductive health, and metabolic, physiologic and genetic health and are without benefit." Just last month, The Huffington Post wrote of a study linking GM food to organ failure.
But beyond the food we eat, there is a serious impact to the environment. The Center for Food Safety (CFS) outlines the environmental impacts to include an "uncontrolled biological pollution, threatening numerous microbial, plant and animal species with extinction, and a potential contamination of all non-genetically engineered life forms with novel and possibly hazardous genetic material."
The US doesn't require food manufacturers to label GMO products so it's difficult to know which foods have been altered. I've read that there is an estimated 30,000 foods found on grocery store shelves that contain a GM ingredient or 75% of processed foods in the US. DisabledWorld.com reported that from 1995 to 2005, total worldwide land surface growing GMO crops increased from 4.2 million acres to 222 million acres.
There are many GM foods, but five account for the highest volume of food and food ingredients. The CFS reports that "currently, up to 85 percent of US corn is genetically engineered as are 91 percent of soybeans and 88 percent of cotton (cottonseed oil is used in food products)." Canola is one of the top five, and newly added is sugar beets. Some examples of these GMO products:
Corn - corn flour, meal, oil, starch & syrup, sweetners (fructose, glucose), modified food starch
Soy - soy flour, lecithin, vegetable oil, soy beverages, tofu
Cotton - cottonseed oil
Canola - canola oil
Sugar Beets - any sweetener not labeled 100% cane sugar, evaporated cane juice or organic sugar
Unless the product package specifies that the food is non-GMO, then you can assume that if it has one of these ingredients, then it's been genetically modified. The best list of GMO crops I've found is on DisabledWorld.com. Here's an incredible Non-GMO Shopping Guide. It lists products by brands, includes brands that do use GMO ingredients and lists a ton of "hidden" GMO ingredients.
There are many GM foods, but five account for the highest volume of food and food ingredients. The CFS reports that "currently, up to 85 percent of US corn is genetically engineered as are 91 percent of soybeans and 88 percent of cotton (cottonseed oil is used in food products)." Canola is one of the top five, and newly added is sugar beets. Some examples of these GMO products:
Corn - corn flour, meal, oil, starch & syrup, sweetners (fructose, glucose), modified food starch
Soy - soy flour, lecithin, vegetable oil, soy beverages, tofu
Cotton - cottonseed oil
Canola - canola oil
Sugar Beets - any sweetener not labeled 100% cane sugar, evaporated cane juice or organic sugar
Unless the product package specifies that the food is non-GMO, then you can assume that if it has one of these ingredients, then it's been genetically modified. The best list of GMO crops I've found is on DisabledWorld.com. Here's an incredible Non-GMO Shopping Guide. It lists products by brands, includes brands that do use GMO ingredients and lists a ton of "hidden" GMO ingredients.
What's most difficult for me, is that I can't seem to avoid GMO foods without making drastic and unwanted changes to our shopping and eating habits. In fact, it makes me downright angry to find out that we've been human guinea pigs for years now, and that I've unknowingly feed my family these foods. It's possible that the soy formula and milk that Abigail drank from 7 months of age to the age of 2 could very well be the cause of her peanut allergy. Since 1996, when GMO's hit the mainstream food supply, food allergies and chronic diseases have doubled. From what I am reading, there is not adequate testing, our government is leaving it up to big business to determine what's safe and what's not, other countries' governments have long since realized that there is a serious health risk and are imposing regulations while big business is doing everything in it's power to shut down the small farmers who want to avoid the use of genetically modified seeds for their crops.
NaturalNews.com has created a good list of ways to avoid GMO foods. Obviously, eating organic is the easiest. Using the shopping guide I mentioned above is helpful, but frustrating. The products tend to be more expensive and many aren't safe for our household because of the risk of cross-contamination with peanuts/tree nuts. I've done a few things like purchase organic produce, rice and canned goods, switched to Safflower Oil for cooking, purchase Kashi crackers and cereal, and Kettle potato chips. Trader Joes is another source for non-GMO snacks. However, I've got a really long way to go!
Here are a few more links if you want to do a little more reading.
Here are a few more links if you want to do a little more reading.
Labels:
GMO food,
healthy changes,
organic
Saturday, January 30, 2010
Snow Day Requirement
It's snowing! And, has been since yesterday afternoon! We've had some sleet, but mostly, just snow. It's wonderful. Where we live in North Carolina, we often get freezing rain, but not inches of nice, powdery snow. We're up to about 6 inches and counting. It's been years since we've had this much. The kids have already been outside and are now back in warming up. Abigail's first request upon entering the house was for hot chocolate.
I didn't have any packets of hot cocoa so we improvised. It actually turned out really good, and I don't mind at all that Abigail drank the whole mug. I purchase organic chocolate soy milk for my 2 year old son to drink at lunch. I heated a mug of the milk in the microwave for 45 seconds, stirred it and then heated it again for another 45 seconds. Topped with a couple of marshmallows, it was not only a very rich cup of hot chocolate, but probably more nutritious than any of the powdered kind.
Recently, I contacted Nestle about their hot cocoa. Abigail's class was having it for a treat one day at school, and I needed to find out if it was safe for her peanut allergy. Here's an excerpt from their response:
There is no risk of peanut or tree nut contamination in our cocoa products.....
Factories that use a critical allergen as an ingredient take all precautions to avoid cross-contact of products that do not normally contain these allergens and products that do not carry a specific mention in the ingredient statement. Precautionary measures include efficient cleaning of production lines and equipment and strict separation of materials that may contain critical allergens. If an allergen does not appear on the ingredient statement, then it has not been added to the product and the likelihood of cross-contact is so extremely low that the risk is insignificant.
Please note that ingredients and manufacturing conditions can and do change. If you do need to pay attention to allergens in your diet, we strongly encourage you to always check the product label and the list of ingredients.
Now that I know I can just heat up our organic soy milk, I won't be purchasing any more "snow day" packets of cocoa mix. They're too "processed" anyway. But, I do have a question. How do you moms that have kids with life-threatening nut allergies, or you adults with an allergy, feel about that statement "the likelihood of cross-contact is so extremely low that the risk is insignificant"? I ask because I feel it's a "CYA" statement from Nestle. But mostly, I ask because when I initially read the statement, my first thought was that any risk was too much. I then started thinking that I'm just being over-the-top cautious (and many would think I was). In this case, I let Abigail drink the hot chocolate at school, but I did so hesitantly. So, if you have an allergy in your household, I'd really like to hear your opinion. Too risky? Or not?
One side note for purchasers of soy milk. The "Silk" brand soy milk is no longer organic. Dean Foods, the new owner of the "Silk" brand removed the "organic" label on the packaging without alerting the public. They state on their website, that the "Silk" product is not made with genetically modified soybeans, however there is a large movement in the organic community to boycott this brand. Organizations like the The Cornucopia Institute are stating that Dean Foods are using conventional soy beans from China, not disclosing important information and are purposely trying to confuse consumers. Something to consider.
For those of you with snow...hope you are having fun too!
I didn't have any packets of hot cocoa so we improvised. It actually turned out really good, and I don't mind at all that Abigail drank the whole mug. I purchase organic chocolate soy milk for my 2 year old son to drink at lunch. I heated a mug of the milk in the microwave for 45 seconds, stirred it and then heated it again for another 45 seconds. Topped with a couple of marshmallows, it was not only a very rich cup of hot chocolate, but probably more nutritious than any of the powdered kind.
Recently, I contacted Nestle about their hot cocoa. Abigail's class was having it for a treat one day at school, and I needed to find out if it was safe for her peanut allergy. Here's an excerpt from their response:
There is no risk of peanut or tree nut contamination in our cocoa products.....
Factories that use a critical allergen as an ingredient take all precautions to avoid cross-contact of products that do not normally contain these allergens and products that do not carry a specific mention in the ingredient statement. Precautionary measures include efficient cleaning of production lines and equipment and strict separation of materials that may contain critical allergens. If an allergen does not appear on the ingredient statement, then it has not been added to the product and the likelihood of cross-contact is so extremely low that the risk is insignificant.
Please note that ingredients and manufacturing conditions can and do change. If you do need to pay attention to allergens in your diet, we strongly encourage you to always check the product label and the list of ingredients.
Now that I know I can just heat up our organic soy milk, I won't be purchasing any more "snow day" packets of cocoa mix. They're too "processed" anyway. But, I do have a question. How do you moms that have kids with life-threatening nut allergies, or you adults with an allergy, feel about that statement "the likelihood of cross-contact is so extremely low that the risk is insignificant"? I ask because I feel it's a "CYA" statement from Nestle. But mostly, I ask because when I initially read the statement, my first thought was that any risk was too much. I then started thinking that I'm just being over-the-top cautious (and many would think I was). In this case, I let Abigail drink the hot chocolate at school, but I did so hesitantly. So, if you have an allergy in your household, I'd really like to hear your opinion. Too risky? Or not?
One side note for purchasers of soy milk. The "Silk" brand soy milk is no longer organic. Dean Foods, the new owner of the "Silk" brand removed the "organic" label on the packaging without alerting the public. They state on their website, that the "Silk" product is not made with genetically modified soybeans, however there is a large movement in the organic community to boycott this brand. Organizations like the The Cornucopia Institute are stating that Dean Foods are using conventional soy beans from China, not disclosing important information and are purposely trying to confuse consumers. Something to consider.
For those of you with snow...hope you are having fun too!
Labels:
allergen labeling,
Nestle,
organic,
peanut allergy,
soy milk
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)