Abigail "bridged" from a Daisy to a Brownie Troop this year. When the cookie sales started in January, we didn't have a mother that wanted to be "Cookie Mom." I thought we were going to get away with not having to sell cookies. It's not that I don't love a good Thin Mint or Samoa, but the cookies don't come close to meeting my healthy food standard nor are they particularly food allergy friendly. Well, one of the girls in the Troop really wanted to have the cookie selling experience so, here in February, her mom said she'd assume the role of coordinating the cookie sales. Our Troop could use the money so with some enthusiasm, I'm off to go help Abigail sell some cookies. It's stiff competition around here and we're late entering the game so we'll need some luck.
It appears that the Regional Council can decide which of the two licensed Girl Scout cookie manufacturers they'll use. Our cookies come from Little Brownie Bakers (LBB) in Louisville, Kentucky. It's a subsidiary of Keebler, owned by Kellogg's. If you guys are frequent readers of my blog, you know that I've posted about the Kellogg's company and their use of genetically modified ingredients. If not, here's a link to that post. ABC Bakers is the other licensed Girl Scout cookie manufacturer, and they're located in Richmond, Virginia, ironically, closer to us than Louisville, Kentucky.
Each bakery can offer up to 28 different varieties and are responsible for naming them. According to Wikipedia, "the national Girl Scout organization reviews and approves all varieties proposed by the baking companies, but requires only three types: Thin Mints, Peanut Butter Sandwiches (ABC)/Do-Si-Dos (LBB) and Shortbreads (ABC)/Trefoils (LBB). The other kinds can be changed every year, though several popular favorites, such as Caramel DeLites (ABC)/Samoas (LBB) and Peanut Butter Patties (ABC)/Tagalongs (LBB), are consistently available."
This year there are four peanut/tree nut safe cookies offered by Little Brownie Bakers. They are the Trefoils, Samoas, Thank U Very Munch and Thin Mints. According to their website, they label using a "May Contain" statement.. "For peanuts and tree nuts, we have chosen to include cautionary labeling in the form of a "may contain" statement. This indicates that the product shares processing equipment with another product that contains peanuts or tree nuts." Here's a link to their Nutrition Guide.
Here is the link to the ABC Bakers' Nutrition Guide. They also label with a "May Contains" statement, "in addition, we call out all allergens on our packaging and order cards and provide specific warning if a product is made on a line that also produces product with a common allergen such as peanuts." There are just three peanut/tree nut safe varieties for this year. They are Thin Mints, Thanks-A-Lots and Lemonades.
So, once again, Abigail will be selling cookies that she can't eat, and I'll be buying cookies that I don't want to eat. I am really late in posting this information. Most of you have already probably been approached to purchase a box..or two. I was really hoping that we were getting out of selling this year. So close!
We've been on a strict avoidance of all peanut products since my daughter was diagnosed with an allergy at 18 months. Abigail is now 9 and our family is blessed to be participating in a Clinical Trial at Duke Hospital (now UNC Hospital). Reading every label on every food item I purchase has also given me a strong sense of what it takes to eat healthy. So, here's our journey to eating healthy and becoming peanut allergy free!
Monday, February 7, 2011
Saturday, February 5, 2011
Happy Birthday & Get Well Soon
Today is Abigail's birthday. She's had a fever off and on for the last two days. It's put a real damper on the birthday festivities. She also had a Father/Daughter dance that she and her dad were supposed to attend tonight. Tomorrow both sets of grandparents were coming for cake and ice cream...and presents, but we don't want to expose them to whatever bug Abigail's picked up. She's pretty disappointed, but been a really good sport about it.
I've tried to make her day as special as possible. This morning we made waffles and pancake puffs...with candles. We've rented movies and video games. We've decorated a cake that is too big now that family is not coming tomorrow to help eat it. We've opened presents and painted fingernails with a new nail polish set that she got for her birthday. And, we let her have her choice of take-out which was McDonald's. That's how much I was trying to make her day great. I let her eat a McDonald's Happy Meal.
We put those allergy safe jelly beans to good use on her birthday cake. Abigail asked for a chocolate cake decorated with a rainbow, peace signs, hearts and stars. She had a good time making the rainbow and peace sign "clouds" and instructing me where to put the hearts and stars. It turned out pretty cute, and she was thrilled with the end results.
Happy Birthday dear Abigail! Love you! Hope you feel better soon.
I've tried to make her day as special as possible. This morning we made waffles and pancake puffs...with candles. We've rented movies and video games. We've decorated a cake that is too big now that family is not coming tomorrow to help eat it. We've opened presents and painted fingernails with a new nail polish set that she got for her birthday. And, we let her have her choice of take-out which was McDonald's. That's how much I was trying to make her day great. I let her eat a McDonald's Happy Meal.
We put those allergy safe jelly beans to good use on her birthday cake. Abigail asked for a chocolate cake decorated with a rainbow, peace signs, hearts and stars. She had a good time making the rainbow and peace sign "clouds" and instructing me where to put the hearts and stars. It turned out pretty cute, and she was thrilled with the end results.
Happy Birthday dear Abigail! Love you! Hope you feel better soon.
Labels:
candy,
food allergy,
McDonald's,
peanut safe birthday cake
Wednesday, February 2, 2011
Latest Trip to Duke
It's been three months since our last trip to Duke University Hospital. It was time to hit the road and make the drive to Durham to visit the Duke Clinical Research Unit.
It was a lab visit. These occur every 6 months. I think Abigail dreads the saliva collection more than the blood draw. She dislikes spitting into that collection tube. She also had another skin prick test. The last one was done at Abigail's food challenge back in June of last year. Here's a picture from that test.
It was a lab visit. These occur every 6 months. I think Abigail dreads the saliva collection more than the blood draw. She dislikes spitting into that collection tube. She also had another skin prick test. The last one was done at Abigail's food challenge back in June of last year. Here's a picture from that test.
Here's a picture of her back after the test this week. The top prick on the left is the highest dose of the peanut protein. The prick on the bottom right is the histamine. That first prick is about the same size as the one in June 2010. The second prick was about the size of a pin head. Her doctor traced it, but didn't record the others. There was nothing to trace. You can definitely see the difference between these tests. How exciting!
Last, but not least, they had to do a blood draw to get new IgE numbers. I know they do a regular blood panel to monitor her overall health, but I'm not sure what else they look at. Regardless, there were 5, maybe 6 tubes they needed to fill. Do you know what Abigail did? The nurse inserted the needle, but Abigail put on and removed each of the tubes. It was unbelievable. Here's a picture of her changing out the tube.
Six months ago, Abigail's IgE number was 12.8. The doctor thinks that this time around we might possibly see a single digit number on the lab report. I can't wait to get those results!
There was also opportunity to ask lots of questions about what's next for us in the trial as well as get an update on the results to date of the sublingual immunotherapy study. I'll cover all of that in my next post.
Friday, January 28, 2011
Allergy Friendly Jelly Beans
I was out shopping this morning and came across a brand of candy, Gimbals, that is free of all 8 of the top allergens, peanuts, tree nuts, milk, eggs, gluten, soy, fish and shell fish. Considering that doesn't happen very often, I just had to share my find.
Abigail's birthday is next weekend, and she wants a chocolate cake with pink frosting. She also wants it decorated with all of her favorite symbols...rainbows, peace signs, hearts and stars. I'm actually getting off quite easy with this one. To avoid mixing so many colors of frosting, my original plan was to use the Rainbow Twizzlers Twists to make the rainbow on the cake. However, on the shelf right beside the Twizzlers was a bag of gourmet jelly beans, in 41 flavors and a ton of colors. I was pleasantly surprised to see this allergen label on the back:
I think Abigail is going to really enjoy sorting through the colors and to help form a large multi-flavored rainbow on the cake.
I found the bag of jelly beans at Wal-Mart for a little over $3.00. It doesn't meet my healthy food standard of non-GMO, no artificial flavors or artificial colors, but it is for a birthday cake after all.
P.S. I was able to find organic, peanut/tree nut safe jelly beans online from both Surf Sweets and The Jelly Bean Planet if you're neither in a hurry or on a budget.
Abigail's birthday is next weekend, and she wants a chocolate cake with pink frosting. She also wants it decorated with all of her favorite symbols...rainbows, peace signs, hearts and stars. I'm actually getting off quite easy with this one. To avoid mixing so many colors of frosting, my original plan was to use the Rainbow Twizzlers Twists to make the rainbow on the cake. However, on the shelf right beside the Twizzlers was a bag of gourmet jelly beans, in 41 flavors and a ton of colors. I was pleasantly surprised to see this allergen label on the back:
I think Abigail is going to really enjoy sorting through the colors and to help form a large multi-flavored rainbow on the cake.
I found the bag of jelly beans at Wal-Mart for a little over $3.00. It doesn't meet my healthy food standard of non-GMO, no artificial flavors or artificial colors, but it is for a birthday cake after all.
P.S. I was able to find organic, peanut/tree nut safe jelly beans online from both Surf Sweets and The Jelly Bean Planet if you're neither in a hurry or on a budget.
Labels:
candy,
Gimbals,
peanut safe birthday cake
Sunday, January 23, 2011
Trader Joe's Shopping List
I'm doing it again. I'm singing praises for Trader Joe's. Too bad I don't get paid for these posts or at least get a store discount!
I was talking with my girlfriends the other day about Trader Joe's. One of them has a child with a peanut allergy, and she was frustrated to find so many items with a "manufactured in a facility with peanut/tree nut" warning. I'm with her there. It's very frustrating especially because there weren't always so many products with that label. Our Trader Joe's store changed to a different regional distribution warehouse for it's inventory. This particular warehouse stocks a lot more products made by manufacturers that have more cross-contamination occurrences.
In our conversation I mentioned that regardless of all of those products with a peanut/tree nut allergen label, I somehow managed to still spend over $240 during my monthly trip to Trader Joe's. Because of the distance to the store, I only go once a month. I have to strategically shop, and I usually require 2 grocery carts in my effort to stock up. I can't imagine what I would spend if I could purchase cereals, breads and more boxed ingredients that were safe for Abigail.
My friend was surprised that I could find that much to purchase so for kicks I started making a list of all of the items that I do purchase. As I was putting together my list, I thought I might as well make it double as my grocery list so I ended up putting a little more effort into it. I know I didn't remember everything, but it's a good first start, and I thought I'd share it. Here's my Trader Joe's shopping list.
Just a couple of quick notes.

In our conversation I mentioned that regardless of all of those products with a peanut/tree nut allergen label, I somehow managed to still spend over $240 during my monthly trip to Trader Joe's. Because of the distance to the store, I only go once a month. I have to strategically shop, and I usually require 2 grocery carts in my effort to stock up. I can't imagine what I would spend if I could purchase cereals, breads and more boxed ingredients that were safe for Abigail.
My friend was surprised that I could find that much to purchase so for kicks I started making a list of all of the items that I do purchase. As I was putting together my list, I thought I might as well make it double as my grocery list so I ended up putting a little more effort into it. I know I didn't remember everything, but it's a good first start, and I thought I'd share it. Here's my Trader Joe's shopping list.
Just a couple of quick notes.
- First, just because it's safe in my store, doesn't mean that it will be in yours especially if you live in a different part of the country so always check the labels.
- Second, while the majority of the items are safe for Abigail there are a couple of items that I've put a "*" next to because I buy them for my husband, son or myself. We keep those items on the top shelf, and Abigail knows she can't eat them. We're also careful of when and where we eat them. An example of these items are the cereal snack bars and raw almonds that my husband takes to work.
- Third, all of the items on my list are rGBH free, contain no GM ingredients, artificial colors, preservatives or artificial sweeteners and on average cost less than what I can purchase elsewhere. They're also usually the Trader Joe's store brand. The aisles that I've listed are for my store and to help me with my shopping. That also goes for the order it's listed in.
- Lastly, you might find some key items missing from my list like the milk. That doesn't mean it doesn't meet my safe food criteria, it just means that I prefer the taste of a different brand of milk.
Tuesday, January 18, 2011
Genetically Modified Foods and the Link to Allergies - Part 3
This is the final part to my series on the link between allergies and genetically modified foods. This post focuses on why our children, newborns and pregnant women are at the biggest risk of developing long-term health concerns as a result of consuming GM foods.
Referencing the article "Moms! GMO Foods Threaten Your Children" on the Nutrition Center Research's website, here's why:
In this particular study, female lab rats were given GM soy before conception and continuing through pregnancy and weaning. Here are the conclusions:
1. Of the offspring, 55.6% died within three weeks compared to 9% from non-GM soy controls.
2. Some pups from GM-fed mothers were significantly smaller and both mothers and pups were more aggressive.
3. In a separate study, after a lab began feeding rats a commercial diet containing GM soy, offspring mortality reached 55.3%.
4. When offspring from GM-fed rats were mated together, they were unable to conceive.
In the article, Genetically Engineered Foods Pose Health Risk for Children, written by Jeffrey M. Smith, author of Seeds of Deception, a UK government-funded study demonstrated that young rats fed a GM potato developed potentially pre-cancerous cell growth, damaged immune systems, partial atrophy of the liver, and inhibited development of their brains, livers and testicles. When the lead scientist went public with his concerns, he was promptly fired from his job after 35 years and silenced with threats of a lawsuit.
According to that same article, differences in GM food will likely have a much larger impact on children because they are three to four times more susceptible to allergies. Children convert more of the food into body-building material. Altered nutrients or added toxins can result in developmental problems. Here are a couple more blurbs..
Kids are regularly fed GM soy-based infant formula. The digestive capacity of small children is less than adults, suggesting that more GM DNA might survive with more transgenes ending up inside gut bacteria or possibly inside organs.
What about corn genetically engineered to create its own pesticide? If the inserted gene were to transfer from the corn that children eat into their gut bacteria, it could theoretically transform their intestinal flora into living pesticide factories.
Children prone to ear and other infections may be at risk of facing antibiotic resistant strains of bacteria, due to the use of antibiotic resistant genes.
Milk and dairy products from cows treated with the genetically engineered bovine growth hormone (rbGH) contain an increased amount of the hormone IGF-1, which is one of the highest risk factors associated with breast and prostate cancer. “rbGH and its digested products could be absorbed from milk into blood, particularly in infants, and produce hormonal and allergic effects, i.e., premature growth and breast stimulation in infants.”
I did a lot of cutting and pasting in this post which I really hate to do. There's a lot more information to further explain these blurbs that I pulled from the article written by Jeffrey Smith. I'd encourage you to read it in it's entirety.
One last thought to leave you with. While we have the choice to limit our childrens' exposure to GM foods by packing safe lunches, what about the children that depend on the school system for hot lunches and often breakfast too? Wonder about the quality of food our kids are getting for $2.00 (or that matter, us, on the $$ menu in fast food restaurants)? You can bet it's below par. Here's one more reference article published on the Center for Environmental Education's website outlining how school food effects the health of students.
Referencing the article "Moms! GMO Foods Threaten Your Children" on the Nutrition Center Research's website, here's why:
- Young, fast-developing bodies are influenced most.
- Children are more susceptible to allergies.
- Children are more susceptible to problems with milk.
- Children are more susceptible to nutritional problems.
- Children are in danger from antibiotic resistant diseases.
- Young, fast-developing bodies are influenced most.
In this particular study, female lab rats were given GM soy before conception and continuing through pregnancy and weaning. Here are the conclusions:
1. Of the offspring, 55.6% died within three weeks compared to 9% from non-GM soy controls.
2. Some pups from GM-fed mothers were significantly smaller and both mothers and pups were more aggressive.
3. In a separate study, after a lab began feeding rats a commercial diet containing GM soy, offspring mortality reached 55.3%.
4. When offspring from GM-fed rats were mated together, they were unable to conceive.
In the article, Genetically Engineered Foods Pose Health Risk for Children, written by Jeffrey M. Smith, author of Seeds of Deception, a UK government-funded study demonstrated that young rats fed a GM potato developed potentially pre-cancerous cell growth, damaged immune systems, partial atrophy of the liver, and inhibited development of their brains, livers and testicles. When the lead scientist went public with his concerns, he was promptly fired from his job after 35 years and silenced with threats of a lawsuit.
According to that same article, differences in GM food will likely have a much larger impact on children because they are three to four times more susceptible to allergies. Children convert more of the food into body-building material. Altered nutrients or added toxins can result in developmental problems. Here are a couple more blurbs..
Kids are regularly fed GM soy-based infant formula. The digestive capacity of small children is less than adults, suggesting that more GM DNA might survive with more transgenes ending up inside gut bacteria or possibly inside organs.
What about corn genetically engineered to create its own pesticide? If the inserted gene were to transfer from the corn that children eat into their gut bacteria, it could theoretically transform their intestinal flora into living pesticide factories.
Children prone to ear and other infections may be at risk of facing antibiotic resistant strains of bacteria, due to the use of antibiotic resistant genes.
Milk and dairy products from cows treated with the genetically engineered bovine growth hormone (rbGH) contain an increased amount of the hormone IGF-1, which is one of the highest risk factors associated with breast and prostate cancer. “rbGH and its digested products could be absorbed from milk into blood, particularly in infants, and produce hormonal and allergic effects, i.e., premature growth and breast stimulation in infants.”
I did a lot of cutting and pasting in this post which I really hate to do. There's a lot more information to further explain these blurbs that I pulled from the article written by Jeffrey Smith. I'd encourage you to read it in it's entirety.
One last thought to leave you with. While we have the choice to limit our childrens' exposure to GM foods by packing safe lunches, what about the children that depend on the school system for hot lunches and often breakfast too? Wonder about the quality of food our kids are getting for $2.00 (or that matter, us, on the $$ menu in fast food restaurants)? You can bet it's below par. Here's one more reference article published on the Center for Environmental Education's website outlining how school food effects the health of students.
Labels:
children's health,
food allergies,
GMO food,
soy formula
Tuesday, January 11, 2011
Genetically Modified Foods and the Link to Allergies - Part 2
I've struggled with writing this post. I'm not a scientist, doctor or other type of medical or allergy specialist. I'm just a mom that's spent the last 6 1/2 years trying to learn everything I can about my daughter's peanut allergy.
Information regarding the link between genetically modified foods and allergies is not only hard for me to fully comprehend, but it's even harder to put those thoughts together in a post without simply cutting and pasting from other resources. I'm going to try hard not to, but here's credit in advance to the articles I'm referring to to write this post. Here goes.
In it's simplest form, GM food is food that has had genes from other plants, bacteria and viruses inserted into it's genetic structure. This in turn creates a new protein that may/may not have been present before which may/may not trigger an allergic reaction.
It's considered inhumane to test these newly formed proteins in GM foods on humans prior to releasing it into our food supply. I find it ironic that it is considered okay to put it on our grocery store shelves in the form of a processed food ingredient and then wait to see what happens. Because it takes humans eating a food several times before the protein causes us to be allergic, there is really no good way to then go back and see if a particular engineered food is the culprit.
I'm going to use GM soybeans as an example of why there is a possible link between GM foods and allergies simply because that's the one used by the Organic Consumers Association (OCA) in their article, "Genetically Engineered Foods May Cause Rising Food Allergies". There are plenty of examples with other GM crops like corn, cottonseed, sugar beets, canola, Hawaiian papaya, some zucchini and crook neck squash.
The GM soybean was created in the U.S. in 1996 by using a bacteria that formed a new protein that's never before been consumed by a human. Scientist must run all newly formed proteins through an International database comparing it's amino sequence with amino sequences that have been known to trigger allergic reactions. If known allergens are found to be present, it is required that either additional testing be performed or that the GM crop not be released. In the case of the GM soybean, there were sections of a protein that are identical to known allergens, but the crop was released prior to the creation of the database.
For us dealing specifically with peanut allergies, there is at least one known protein in natural soybeans that has a cross-reactivity with peanut allergies. Whether genetically modified soybeans might increase that chance of cross-reactivity remains to be seen. It's certainly coincidence that the number of peanut allergies has doubled in the years following the introduction of GM soybeans.
According to the OCA, another study verified that GM soybeans contain a unique, unexpected protein, not found in non-GM soy controls. Scientist tested that protein and determined that it reacted with the IgE antibody which is responsible for allergic reactions. "The fact that the unique protein created by GM soy interacted with IgE suggests that it might also trigger allergies."
Using a question posed from the article "Ah-tchoo!: Do Genetically Modified Foods Cause Allergies" written on emagazine.com, if you are allergic to fish and you eat a tomato that has been genetically modified with genes from a fish, is it then possible that you would then react as if you'd eaten fish? According to that article by OCA, it is. The OCA article gives this example. In the mid 1990's, there was an attempt to produce healthier soybeans by using a gene from Brazil nuts. Blood tests from people with allergies to Brazil nuts showed an allergic reaction to this new soybean. This was one case where the product never went to market.
While there is really no concrete evidence here in the U.S. to prove a link between GM foods and allergies as well as other health dangers, there have been limited studies in other countries. Funny how those same countries both restrict the use of GM crops grown as well as require imported GM food from the U.S. to be labeled accordingly. By the way, why aren't GM foods tested in the U.S.? According to that article in emagazine.com, the FDA (Richard Herndon, an FDA spokesperson) says that it doesn't subject GM foods to the same testing as, for example, a new chemical additive, because new gene introductions do not "materially change the composition" of food. "FDA has no basis for concluding that bio-engineered foods differ from other foods in any meaningful or uniform way, or that, as a class, foods developed by the new techniques present any different or greater safety concern than foods developed by traditional plant breeding."
I hope all of this information has at least got you thinking about a possible link between food allergies and genetically modified foods. I urge you to continue to do your own research about all of the possible health risks with eating these types of foods as well as to follow the links in the posts and read the reference articles in their entirety. Also, here's a link to a past post I wrote about avoiding GM foods. There's more information in that post on health hazards as well as tips to avoid GM foods.
Author Note: I just found an Organic Soy Scorecard on The Cornucopia Institute's website. It rates companies on their organic soy production.
Information regarding the link between genetically modified foods and allergies is not only hard for me to fully comprehend, but it's even harder to put those thoughts together in a post without simply cutting and pasting from other resources. I'm going to try hard not to, but here's credit in advance to the articles I'm referring to to write this post. Here goes.
In it's simplest form, GM food is food that has had genes from other plants, bacteria and viruses inserted into it's genetic structure. This in turn creates a new protein that may/may not have been present before which may/may not trigger an allergic reaction.
It's considered inhumane to test these newly formed proteins in GM foods on humans prior to releasing it into our food supply. I find it ironic that it is considered okay to put it on our grocery store shelves in the form of a processed food ingredient and then wait to see what happens. Because it takes humans eating a food several times before the protein causes us to be allergic, there is really no good way to then go back and see if a particular engineered food is the culprit.
I'm going to use GM soybeans as an example of why there is a possible link between GM foods and allergies simply because that's the one used by the Organic Consumers Association (OCA) in their article, "Genetically Engineered Foods May Cause Rising Food Allergies". There are plenty of examples with other GM crops like corn, cottonseed, sugar beets, canola, Hawaiian papaya, some zucchini and crook neck squash.
The GM soybean was created in the U.S. in 1996 by using a bacteria that formed a new protein that's never before been consumed by a human. Scientist must run all newly formed proteins through an International database comparing it's amino sequence with amino sequences that have been known to trigger allergic reactions. If known allergens are found to be present, it is required that either additional testing be performed or that the GM crop not be released. In the case of the GM soybean, there were sections of a protein that are identical to known allergens, but the crop was released prior to the creation of the database.
For us dealing specifically with peanut allergies, there is at least one known protein in natural soybeans that has a cross-reactivity with peanut allergies. Whether genetically modified soybeans might increase that chance of cross-reactivity remains to be seen. It's certainly coincidence that the number of peanut allergies has doubled in the years following the introduction of GM soybeans.
According to the OCA, another study verified that GM soybeans contain a unique, unexpected protein, not found in non-GM soy controls. Scientist tested that protein and determined that it reacted with the IgE antibody which is responsible for allergic reactions. "The fact that the unique protein created by GM soy interacted with IgE suggests that it might also trigger allergies."
Using a question posed from the article "Ah-tchoo!: Do Genetically Modified Foods Cause Allergies" written on emagazine.com, if you are allergic to fish and you eat a tomato that has been genetically modified with genes from a fish, is it then possible that you would then react as if you'd eaten fish? According to that article by OCA, it is. The OCA article gives this example. In the mid 1990's, there was an attempt to produce healthier soybeans by using a gene from Brazil nuts. Blood tests from people with allergies to Brazil nuts showed an allergic reaction to this new soybean. This was one case where the product never went to market.
While there is really no concrete evidence here in the U.S. to prove a link between GM foods and allergies as well as other health dangers, there have been limited studies in other countries. Funny how those same countries both restrict the use of GM crops grown as well as require imported GM food from the U.S. to be labeled accordingly. By the way, why aren't GM foods tested in the U.S.? According to that article in emagazine.com, the FDA (Richard Herndon, an FDA spokesperson) says that it doesn't subject GM foods to the same testing as, for example, a new chemical additive, because new gene introductions do not "materially change the composition" of food. "FDA has no basis for concluding that bio-engineered foods differ from other foods in any meaningful or uniform way, or that, as a class, foods developed by the new techniques present any different or greater safety concern than foods developed by traditional plant breeding."
I hope all of this information has at least got you thinking about a possible link between food allergies and genetically modified foods. I urge you to continue to do your own research about all of the possible health risks with eating these types of foods as well as to follow the links in the posts and read the reference articles in their entirety. Also, here's a link to a past post I wrote about avoiding GM foods. There's more information in that post on health hazards as well as tips to avoid GM foods.
Author Note: I just found an Organic Soy Scorecard on The Cornucopia Institute's website. It rates companies on their organic soy production.
Labels:
GM soybeans,
GMO food,
peanut allergy
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)